FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro"
2016.012
Date: 30/1/2016

Reforming the IPCC’s Assessment of Climate Change Economics


Authors:
Gabriel Chan (Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota); Carlo Carraro (University of Venice, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei); Ottmar Edenhofer (Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Potsdam Instiute fro Climate Impact Resarch); Charles Kolstad (Stanford University); Robert Stavins (John F. Kennedy School of Governement - Harvard University)
Type: Journal
JEL n.: Q5, Q58
JEL: Climate Change Economics
Pages:
Published in: Climate Change Economics, Vol. 07, Issue 01
Keywords: Scientific Assessment, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Scientific Communication

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is broadly viewed as the world’s most legitimate scientific assessment body that periodically assesses the economics of climate change (among many other topics) for policy audiences. However, growing procedural inefficiencies and limitations to substantive coverage have made the IPCC an increasingly unattractive forum for the most qualified climate economists. Drawing on our observations and personal experience working on the most recent IPCC report, published last year, we propose four reforms to the IPCC’s process that we believe will lower the cost for volunteering as an IPCC author: improving interactions between governments and academics, making IPCC operations more efficient, clarifying and strengthening conflict of interest rules, and expanding outreach. We also propose three reforms to the IPCC’s substantive coverage to clarify the IPCC’s role and to make participation as an author more intellectually rewarding: complementing the IPCC with other initiatives, improving the integration of economics with other disciplines, and providing complete data for policymakers to make decisions. Despite the distinct characteristics of the IPCC that create challenges for authors unlike those in any other review body, we continue to believe in the importance of the IPCC for providing the most visible line of public communication between the scholarly community and policymakers. 

***

Suggested citation: G. Chan, C. Carraro, O. Edenhofer, C. Kolstad, Robert Stavins, Reforming the Ipcc’s Assessment of Climate Change Economics, Clim. Change Econ. 07, 1640001 (2016) DOI: 10.1142/S2010007816400017

Download file
Download PDF file
links
Link
Reforming the IPCC’s Assessment of Climate Change Economics

FEEM Newsletter & Update

Subscribe to stay connected.

Your personal data will be processed by Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. – data Controller – with the aim of emailing the FEEM newsletter & Update. The use of Your email address is necessary for the implementation of the newsletter service. You are invited to read the Privacy Policy in order to obtain additional information about the protection of Your rights.

This Website uses technical cookies and cookie analytics, as well as “third party” profiling cookies.
If you close this banner or you decide to continue navigating on this Website, you express consent to the use of cookies. If you need additional information or you wish to express selective choices on the use of cookies, please refer to the   Cookie PolicyI agree