FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro"
2016.046
Date: 15/6/2016

Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives


Authors:
Erin Baker (University of Massachussets); Valentina Bosetti (Bocconi University, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei); Ahti Salo (Aalto University)
JEL n.: D8, D78, D81
Keywords: Deep Uncertainty, Decision Making under Uncertainty, Robust, Dominance

Abstract

We address the problem of choosing a portfolio of policies under “deep uncertainty.” We introduce the idea of belief dominance as a way to derive a set of non-dominated portfolios and robust individual alternatives. Our approach departs from the tradition of providing a single recommended portfolio; rather, it derives a group of good portfolios. The belief dominance concept allows us to synthesize multiple expert- or model- based beliefs by uncovering the range of alternatives that are intelligent responses to the range of beliefs. This goes beyond solutions that are optimal for any specific set of beliefs to uncover other defensible solutions that may not otherwise be revealed. We illustrate our approach using an important problem in the climate change and energy policy context: choosing among clean energy technology R&D portfolios. We demonstrate how the belief dominance concept can reveal portfolios and alternatives that would otherwise remain uncovered.

***

Suggested citation: Baker, E., V. Bosetti, A. Salo, (2016), 'Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives', Nota di Lavoro 46.2016, Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei

Download file
Download file

FEEM Newsletter & Update

Subscribe to stay connected.

Your data will be processed by FEEM - Eni Enrico Mattei Foundation - Data Controller - to receive the Foundation's Newsletter & Update via e-mail. To send the requested information, the Data Controller uses e-mail sending service providers established in the U.S.A .: for this, your consent to the transfer of your email address to the U.S.A. is required, without which it will not be possible to comply with your request. We invite you to consult the complete information to obtain detailed information to protect your rights.