Seminars & webinars
19 September, 2011

Which Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) to use in Cost-Benefit Analyses? A global meta-analysis of Stated Preference Studies

Where: Venice

Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Isola di San Giorgio Maggiore
30124 Venice

at FEEM Milan

How to reach: Google map
Event's Timetable:

h. 12.00 Seminar
h. 13.00 Light Lunch


Seminars Office,


Stale Navrud, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)


The outcome of cost-benefit analyses of environmental and climate, transport and health policies often depend heavily on the number used for the Value of a Statistical Life (VSL). However, VSL numbers vary greatly across countries, and even between sectors in the same country.  Therefore we conduct, to our knowledge, the first global meta-analysis (MA) of stated preference (SP) surveys of mortality risk valuation. The surveys ask adults their willingness to pay (WTP) for small reductions in mortality risks, deriving estimates of sample mean VSL for environmental, health and transport policies. We explain the variation in VSL estimates by differences in characteristics of the SP methodologies applied, the population affected and characteristics of the mortality risks valued; including the magnitude of the risk change. The mean (median) VSL in our full dataset of VSL sample means was found to be around 7.4 million (2.4 million) USD2005. The most important variables explaining the variation in VSL are GDP per capita and the magnitude of the risk change valued. According to theory, however, VSL should be independent of the risk change. We discuss and test a range of quality screening criteria in order to investigate the effect of limiting the MA to high quality studies. When limiting the MA to studies that find statistically significant differences in WTP using external or internal scope tests, without requiring strict proportionality, we find that mean VSL from studies that pass both tests tend to be less sensitive to the magnitude of the risk change. For establishing VSL numbers in individual countries we suggest benefit transfer in terms of  a simple MA function with GDP per capita, or unit value transfer of a VSL estimate from a neighboring country with income adjustments. In both cases we apply an  income elasticity of VSL derived from our screened models equal to 0.7-0.9 with a sensitivity analysis for 0.3-0.4, found for some subsets of the data that satisfy scope tests or use the same high-quality survey.

Download file
Download PDF file
Download file
Download PDF file
Which Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) to use in Cost-Benefit Analyses? A global meta-analysis of Stated Preference Studies

FEEM Newsletter & Update

Subscribe to stay connected.

Your personal data will be processed by Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. – data Controller – with the aim of emailing the FEEM newsletter & Update. The use of Your email address is necessary for the implementation of the newsletter service. You are invited to read the Privacy Policy in order to obtain additional information about the protection of Your rights.

This Website uses technical cookies and cookie analytics, as well as “third party” profiling cookies.
If you close this banner or you decide to continue navigating on this Website, you express consent to the use of cookies. If you need additional information or you wish to express selective choices on the use of cookies, please refer to the   Cookie PolicyI agree